“Preemptive nuclear strike” « Snaphanen.dk

“Preemptive nuclear strike” « Snaphanen.dk


“Wipe the Soviet Union off the Map”

Barely six weeks after the bombing of Hiroshima and Nagasaki, the U.S. War Department released a Secret Plan on September 15, 1945 to bomb 66 cities of the Soviet Union with 204 atomic bombs. The September 1945 Plan was to “Wipe the Soviet Union off the Map” at a time when the US and the USSR were allies. Confirmed by declassified documents, Hiroshima and Nagasaki served as a “Dress Rehearsal”

Det er kun en uge siden, da jeg så Oliver Stones “JFK – destiny betrayed”, at jeg blev klar over, at der under Kennedy og Cubakrisen eksisterede en doktrin, der gik ind for et atomart “first strike” på Sovjetunionen. Kennedys generaler, herunder Curtis LeMay, der hadede  Kennedy, gik under krisen ind for et first strike på Sovjet, og havde det ikke været for præsidenten, havde ingen af os siddet her. Doktrinen blev afklassificeret i 1975. Der skulle iflg. prof. Chossodovsky stadig eksistere en ide om, at atombomber kan brugers “sikkert for civile.” Det er “mini-nukes” eller “taktiske atomvåben.” Beskyttelsen i MAD” – mutually assured destruction er borte.

Det er barokt, at vi skal bildes ind, at Donald Trump skulle udgøre en fare for atomkrig, når det i virkeligheden er Joe Biden, der gør det.* Vi lever ifølge professoren i den farligeste tid siden Cuba-krisen, og the legacy media skjuler det for os. Vi har kun krigsbegejstrede medier og politikere, og en befolkning der tror, at det hele ligger i tryggeste hænder mens de flager med blågult for aggressionerne.

I et interview i Die Welt i går, siger Stoltenberg at vi godt kan forberede os på årtier med krig og konfrontation med Rusland. Hvorfor? Hvilke europæere har nogen interesse i det? Er det det, vi nu har EU og Nato til?

Der er ingen antikrigsbevægelse i dag, fordi medierne skjuler faren for os og vi går lykkeligt rundt og tror, at alt er i de bedste hænder. Vi opretholder presset på Rusland via Ukraine, og tror at det er risikofrit og en god ting. Vestlige politikere som Fogh Rasmussen, kan sige, at “selvfølgelig skal Ukraine ind i Nato.” Det er bindegalt. Læs “Preemptive Nuclear War”: The Historic Battle for Peace and Democracy. A Third World War Threatens the Future of Humanity

Benyt eventuelt lejligheden til at se dokumentaren The Man Who Saved The World

Putin’s February 21st 2022 Statement *

Vladimir Putin’s statement on February 21st, 2022 was a response to US threats to use nuclear weapons on a preemptive basis against Russia, despite Joe Biden’s “reassurance” that the US would not be resorting to “A first strike” nuclear attack against an enemy of America:

“Let me [Putin] explain that U.S. strategic planning documents contain the possibility of a so-called preemptive strike against enemy missile systems. And who is the main enemy for the U.S. and NATO? We know that too. It’s Russia. In NATO documents, our country is officially and directly declared the main threat to North Atlantic security. And Ukraine will serve as a forward springboard for the strike.” (Putin Speech, February 21, 2022, emphasis added)

In July 2021, the Biden administration launched its Nuclear Posture Review (NPR) which was formally announced in October 2022.

The 2022 NPR includes what is described as a “nuclear declaratory policy of the United States”.

The 2022 NPR largely confirms the nuclear options developed by the Obama and Bush administrations predicated on the notion of preemptive nuclear war raised in President Putin’s speech.

The underlying US nuclear doctrine consists in portraying nuclear weapons as a means of “self defense” rather than as a “weapon of mass destruction”.

The NPR does not rule out the possibility of a “first strike” nuclear attack against Russia. Chossodovsky Substack





Source link